Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Composite fails to make grade with 2001 sales

By Don Hogsett -- Home Textiles Today, 8/12/2002

NEW YORK— With sales skidding down in the midst of a deep recession and a weakening retail environment — and still encumbered by heavy debt loads and interest payments — the American textiles industry endured a second straight year of excruciating pain during 2001, with a whopping 80 percent of suppliers, 10 out of 12 key players, losing money last year, a grand total of $620.8 million.

  If there was any good news — and there wasn't much in
  a year punctuated by bankruptcies, defaults and
  liquidations — last year's composite loss for the 12
  companies ranked in the Home Textiles Today Vendor Report Card actually improved somewhat, the loss narrowing by 11.2 percent, from $699.0 million the prior year.

If there was modest improvement to the bottom line, you sure wouldn't know it from the top line last year, with sales for the 12 companies sliding down by 6.5 percent, to $11.6 billion from $12.4 billion last year — a shortfall of more than $812 million.

Some of those dollars just disappeared as retailers increasingly competed with their own suppliers, stepping up their direct sourcing of low-cost product from abroad. In other cases, the decline marks a shift in business from department stores to discounters — and a big downward shift in unit prices, and a corresponding squeeze on margins.

Margins? What margins, some suppliers were wondering, left reeling as lower sales meant lower running rates in their high-fixed-cost plants. Indeed, the composite average gross margin for the sample in this year's Report Card narrowed to just 15.9 percent from 25.6 percent the prior year.

Putting profits under even greater pressure, all the while that margins were eroding, costs were climbing higher, to a composite 12.0 percent of sales from 11.6 percent in 2000.

Measured on an operating basis, the industry did somewhat better, actually making money, if a lot less than the year before. Slammed by the sharply lower margins, composite operating profits plunged by 74.9 percent, to $434.6 million from $1.8 billion the preceding year, a shortfall of $1.3 billion.

Home fashions suppliers significantly outperformed more diversified textiles suppliers, a group that includes such players as Burlington Industries and Cone Mills. Home fashions producers — some of them, like Crown Crafts, turning around their operations and returning to profitability — narrowed their losses by more than 40 percent, to $89.2 million from $150.3 million. And home sales, while declining, fell just 3.2 percent, compared with a double-digit decline of 11.5 percent for diversified textiles producers.

Composite results of 12 textiles companies
(excludes Culp) figures, excluding percentages, in $000s
20012000%CHG
Sales$11,716,091 $12,658,692 -7.4%
Operating income439,633 1,750,420 -74.9
Net income(593,820)(772,539)
Average gross margin15.9%25.6%
SG&A as a % of sales12.111.7
Net debt coverage116.030.4
( ): Denotes loss
Source: Home Textiles Today market research

Composite results of home fashions producers
figures, excluding percentages, in $000s
20012000%CHG
Sales$7,321,914 $7,692,875 -4.8%
Operating income419,171 1,523,315 -72.5
Net income(62,188)(223,917)
Average gross margin19.3%33.2%
SG&A as a % of sales13.613.4
Net debt coverage66.621.0
( ): Denotes loss
Source: Home Textiles Today market research

Composite results of diversified textiles producers
figures, excluding percentages, in $000s
20012000%CHG
Sales$4,394,177 $4,965,817 -11.5%
Operating income20,462 227,105 -91.0
Net income(531,626)(548,623)
Average gross margin10.1%13.7%
SG&A as a % of sales9.69.1
Net debt coverage1128.993.3
( ): Denotes loss
Source: Home Textiles Today market research

Top 3 salesTop 3 earnings
(in $000s)(in $000s)
GOING, GOING: In past editions of the Report Card, vendors were ranked by the top 5 sales and earnings gains. But after failing to find even that many increases a year ago, the Report Card had to resort to ranking companies by size. Last year, there weren't even five companies who managed to make so much as a nickel, and this year the listing gets whittled down even further, to three.
1. Mohawk Inds.$3,445,9451. Mohawk Inds.$188,592
2. WestPoint Stevens1,765,1462. Quaker Fabric9,548
3. Burlington Inds.1,403,9053. Wellman8,389
Source: Home Textiles Today market research

Running on fumes
They didn't have the cash to service their debt (Ranked by the disparity between cash flow and interest expense)
THE TANK IS EMPTY: Mired deep in debt, and in some cases red ink, more than half of the companies measured in this year's Vendor Report Card — seven out of the 12 — couldn't even spin off enough cash last year to cover the interest on their debt, let alone pay down some of the principal. That's a worsening industry profile from the six companies that found themselves in the same predicament during 2000. And given the nature of the beast (interest expense tends to climb rather than fall as companies fall further behind) and last year's weakened economic environment and stalled out retail sales, it comes as no surprise that most of the players are making a repeat performance on the list. Newcomers in this year's ranking include a debt-heavy giant, WestPoint Stevens, as well as Dan River and Cone Mills. Much of the industry is maxxed out, its feet to the flames, after years of throwing cash around to finance high-flying acquisitions that somehow seldom seemed to work or to add lots of capacity that's now become redundant in a rapidly shifting arena of global sourcing.
All figures in $000s
CompanyCash flowInterest expenseShortfall
Pillowtex($53,760)$64,666$118,426
Guilford Mills(51,462)25,29276,754
Polymer Group27,22199,40672,185
Burlington Inds.12,53971,17458,635
Dan River55632,06331,507
WestPoint Stevens120,335141,60621,271
Cone Mills4,67417,16512,491
( ): denotes loss
Source: Home Textiles Today market research

 

Methodology

The 2002 edition of the Home Textiles Today Vendor Report Card is based on data from public documents and was computed by senior research specialist Janice Chamberlain and database coordinator Cynthia Myers.

Formulas used include:

Return on sales: figured by dividing net income by net sales;

Return on equity: net income divided by shareholder equity;

Gross margin: net sales minus cost of goods sold divided by net sales;

SG&A as a percentage of sales: selling, general and administrative expenses divided by net sales;

Net debt coverage: net interest expense divided by operating income. Operating income is defined as net sales minus cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses;

Inventory turns: cost of goods sold divided by average inventory;

Operating return on sales: operating income divided by net sales;

Return on invested capital: operating income divided by total assets. Operating income is defined as net sales minus cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

This year's Report Card ranks 12 publicly reporting companies, down from 15 last year. Springs Industries has become a private company and no longer reports its results; CMI Industries is no longer a home fashions producer after the sale of its blanket and throw business to WestPoint Stevens; and Thomaston Mills has been shut down.

The Report Card was compiled under the direction of business editor Don Hogsett and director of market research Kay Anderson.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Fall Market Kick-Off Party - part I
    HTT’s Market Kick-Off Party on Sept. 15 at the 230 Fifth Penthouse & roof deck drew hundreds of industry execs looking to beat the heat and mingle with colleagues.
  • Fall 08 Market Kick-Off Party - part II
    HTT’s Market Kick-Off Party on Sept. 15 at the 230 Fifth Penthouse & roof deck drew hundreds of industry execs looking to beat the heat and mingle with colleagues.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Home Textiles Today Extra (Daily)
Home Textiles Today's Green (Occasional)
Furniture Today eDaily (Daily)
Furniture Today Bedding Today eWeekly (Weekly)
Furniture Today's Green (Occasional)
eDaily Classifieds (Weekly)
Home Accents Today eWeekly (Weekly)
Home Accents Today Product Line (Bi-Weekly)
Home Accents Today Green (Occasional)
Casual Living eWeekly (Weekly)
Casual Living Green (Occasional)
Kids Today eKids News (Weekly)
Gifts and Decorative Accessories Direct (Weekly)
Gifts and Decorative Accessories Product Wire (Twice A Month)
Gifts & Dec Double Take (Occasional)
Playthings eXtra (Weekly)
Playthings Product Watch (Twice A Month)

About Us    |    Advertising Info    |   Site Map    |   Contact Us    |    Subscription    |   Affiliate Links    |    RSS
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites