Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Discount heads the class in Retail Report Card

Staff -- Home Textiles Today, 7/30/2001

NEW YORK — Dragged down by a weakening sales environment during the second half of last year — which persists until this day — and hammered by an especially poor performance at department stores as consumers pinched their pennies and embraced discounters and off-pricers, U.S. retailers snapped a four-year winning streak in 2000, with profits tumbling down by almost 20 percent.

Unable to gain any traction from a double-digit sales increase, or widespread gains in productivity, the 30 key retailers in this 10th annual edition of the Home Textiles Today Retail Report Card watched their composite profits drop by 19.7 percent, to $9.98 billion from $12.4 billion in 1999 — a wrenching earnings shortfall of $2.5 billion. Missing from this year's ranking are Bradlees and HomePlace, out of business, and Strouds, which is no longer a public company. A fourth, Dollar General, had not yet filed its sales and earnings with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of press time.

Especially hard hit last year as consumers held on tight to their wallets were department stores, with their lingering perception of high prices, where profits were clipped by 81.4 percent, to $514.3 million from $2.8 billion last year. Department store sales were up just 4.0 percent — virtually flat, when taking into account the rate of inflation — to $90.1 billion from $86.7 billion.

Picking up the slack in sales, if not always in profits, were the nation's value retailers. Sales at mass merchants jumped up by 12.9 percent, to $287.1 billion from $254.3 billion in 1999, still stealing market share as bargain-hungry consumers flocked to the bargain bins, increasingly stocking up on the consumables that fill the front of the stores. But even there, it was tough turning a dime, and profits fell back by 0.9 percent, to $7.67 billion from $7.74 billion the previous year, weighed down by combined losses of $602.2 million at four of the eight discounters in this year's ranking — Kmart, Ames, ShopKo and Value City.

Doing even better were the lowest of the low-pricers, two big warehouse operations, Costco and BJ's, where sales advanced by 17.2 percent, to $36.4 billion from $31.1 billion. And profits in this no-frills channel were through the roof, zooming up 50.1 percent, to $762.9 million from $508.4 million in 1999. Profits at Costco shot up by 58.9 percent, and BJ's earnings rose by 18.3 percent.

Still cruising in the passing lane and riding on the fast track was the smaller, but rapidly growing, specialty channel. Driven by sales gains of 25 percent or more at three of the four players in the ranking, sales at specialty stores shot up by 23.3 percent, to $7.2 billion from $5.8 billion. More importantly, profits climbed higher by 19.1 percent, to $388.3 million from $326.1 million. Leading the pack, as it routinely does, was Bed Bath & Beyond, with earnings up by almost a third, and sales climbing higher by 29 percent. The only earnings disappointment came from Williams-Sonoma, where profits were off by 16.6 percent.

Lending some support to the composite bottom line — and it needed all the help it could get — was stepped-up productivity at a broad cross-section of retailers. In a sample of 27 retailers for whom figures were available, somewhat more than two-thirds, 20 of the 27, recorded gains in sales per employee. Leading the list — not surprising, given its no-frills, low-overhead format, was warehouse operator Costco, with sales per employee of $405,400, up from $385,400 last year.

Composite sales and earnings
Home textiles retailers
2000 (x$000s)1999 (x$000s)% change
Net sales$428,850,043$389,338,31110.1%
Net income$9,979,009$12,431,884-19.7%

Composite results by retail format
Ranked by percentage of sales gain (dollar figures in 000s)
SPECIALTY STORES
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$7,210,212$5,849,23223.3%
Net income$388,291$326,10619.1%
WAREHOUSE CLUBS
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$36,448,996$31,092,27817.2%
Net income$762,938$508,44750.1%
DISCOUNTERS
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$287,114,359$254,251,62812.9%
Net income$7,666,886$7,738,522-0.9%
FABRIC STORES
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$1,868,545$1,763,0726.0%
Net income($2,733)$32,416
MAIL-ORDER
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$5,306,233$5,067,1744.7%
Net income$69,282$122,705-43.5%
DEPARTMENT STORES
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$90,146,979$86,701,5004.0%
Net income$514,283$2,759,135-81.4%
NATIONAL CHAINS
2000 1999 %CHG
Net sales$36,548,000$35,141,0004.0%
Net income$1,343,000$1,453,000-7.6%

Top 5 sales gains
1. Kohl's35.0%
2. Value City32.5
3. Bed Bath & Beyond29.0
4. Williams-Sonoma25.3
5. Gottschalks22.6

Top 5 earning gains
1. Stein Mart232.9%
2. Hancock Fabrics59.4
3. Costco58.9
4. Kohl's44.2
5. Spiegel41.6

Sales and profit productivity
Rank by salesRank by incomeCompanySales per employee ($000s)Income per employee ($000s)
14Costco$405.4$8.1
23BJ's328.58.9
32Spiegel230.29.1
423Lillian Vernon191.4(0.9)
51Bed Bath & Beyond159.811.5
629Hanover Direct157.6(22.2)
713Lands' End157.64.0
811Wal-Mart153.85.1
924Kmart146.9(1.0)
1020Dillard's145.7(0.1)
1125Federated Dept. Stores142.7(1.4)
1221ShopKo Stores129.3(0.6)
1310Linens 'N Things128.95.3
145TJX Cos.124.47.0
1528Ames120.9(7.4)
1618Saks119.71.4
1726J.C.Penney119.3(2.6)
1827Value City114.7(5.3)
196Kohl's113.96.9
2012Sears, Roebuck113.24.2
2115Belk108.12.7
228May Dept. Stores105.56.3
239Family Dollar100.45.5
247Pier 1 Imports96.76.5
2514Stein Mart83.82.7
2616Williams-Sonoma83.22.6
2719Gottschalks80.00.9
2822Jo-Ann Stores66.5(0.6)
2917Hancock Fabrics59.31.7

Make or break: The bottom line
Return on sales: Net income as a percentage of sales
THE STRONG GET STRONGER: No surprises here. Predictably and routinely, Bed Bath & Beyond records the strongest bottom line in the business. And in a particularly tricky year for many U.S. retailers, it even managed to boost its return on sales. So did Pier 1, another veteran of the Top Three ranking. Kohl's makes a return appearance. And in a year that favored discounters, Kohl's displaces May Department Stores Co.
20001999
1. Bed Bath & Beyond7.2%7.1%
2. Pier 1 Imports6.76.1
3. Kohl's6.05.7
AND THE WEAK … : Each of these retailers lost money last year. Hanover widened its loss, and Ames and Value City headed south after recording small profits the year before.
20001999
1. Hanover Direct-14.1%-3.1%
2. Ames-6.10.4
3. Value City-4.62.0

The A-Team: Getting back to basics
Operating margin: Operating profits as a % of sales
THE CREAM OF THE CROP: At the end of the day, the only thing that counts is building sales and margins, while driving costs down. That's best reflected in the operating margin — operating profits as a percentage of sales — where the view is unobstructed by one-time charges, taxes, interest expense or debt. Saks and Pier 1 once again come out on top, with Kohl's joining the list this year by knocking off May Department Stores.
20001999
1. Saks14.2%16.3%
2. Pier 1 Imports13.813.3
3. Kohl's13.212.5
SKIM MILK: The direct-mail channel is still having a tough time of it, caught between what's left of e-tailing and sluggish consumer spending. Hurting Spiegel was an 8 percent decline in same-store sales. Hanover remains weak, and they're joined in this year's ranking by Value City, which, correspondingly, also recorded the lowest return on sales.
20001999
1. Spiegel-12.9%-10.1%
2. Hanover Direct-6.7-1.1
3. Value City-6.83.1

Acid test
Percentage change in same-store sales
IN THE PASSING LANE: The ultimate litmus test for any retailer, same-store sales, documents staying power and the ability to generate sales without building costly bricks-and-mortar units. Not surprisingly, in the current tricky retail environment — with gas and oil prices rising, digging deep into disposable income, and consumers pinching pennies — value-oriented retailers dominated the leader-board.
20001999
1. Costco11.0%10.0%
2. Stein Mart9.72.3
3. Kohl's9.07.9
SLOWING DOWN: At least on paper, Spiegel lost the most ground last year, but this reflects only business in its Eddie Bauer stores; the number doesn't measure its catalog or other businesses, all of which showed improvement in overall sales and profits.
20001999
1. Spiegel*-8.0%6.0%
2. Dillard's-3.03.0
3. J.C.Penney-2.4-1.1
*Same-store sales for Eddie Bauer stores only.

Through thick and thin
Average gross margin
THE GRAVY TRAIN: Historically, the strongest gross margins in the Home Textiles Today Retail Report Card have consistently been recorded in the specialty channel, notably the fabric and crafts specialists. Last year was no exception, with Hancock Fabrics and Jo-Ann Stores still leading the pack, although Jo-Ann lost some ground last year. They're joined by Lands' End, which enjoyed something of a turnaround last year, displacing direct-mail merchant Lillian Vernon.
20001999
1. Hancock Fabrics50.8%48.7%
2. Lands' End46.244.9
3. Jo-Ann Stores43.545.8
LO-CAL MARGINS: Here it gets tricky. Thin margins don't necessarily mean a company is doing poorly; sometimes it's a function of its format. By their very nature, warehouse clubs and discounters will always have the lowest margins.
20001999
1. BJ's9.4%9.5%
2. Costco10.410.4
3. Kmart19.921.8

Stockpiles
Percentage change in inventories
SLIMMING DOWN: The problem with inventories is that it costs a lot of money to put the goods on the shelf — and a lot more later if the customer isn't biting and the retailer has to mark them down. Each of these three retailers grappled with sales and profit issues last year, and in trying to bring supply in line with demand, and shore up the bottom line, reduced their stockpiles at a double-digit pace.
1. Dillard's-21.1%
2. J.C.Penney-11.4
3. Ames-10.5
BULKING UP: Building inventories is fine and necessary, so long as a retailer has got the sales to support the build-up. No problem with the big-box superstores, Bed Bath & Beyond and Linens 'N Things, both building stores at a rapid pace. And Gottschalks, too, built sales by more than 16 percent last year.
1. Gottschalks42.5%
2. Bed Bath & Beyond29.0
3. Linens 'N Things27.6

Sales per square foot
20001999
1. Williams-Sonoma$1,037$975
2. BJ's386NA
3. Target323240
4. Sears, Roebuck320467
5. Kohl's261243
6. Kmart242232
7. May Dept. Stores197201
8. Bed Bath & Beyond196189
9. Gottschalks196196
10. Saks191180
11. Linens 'N Things160164
12. Ames159150
13. Dillard's152152
14. Belk137131
15. Family Dollar103NA
16. Jo-Ann Stores9288
17. Hancock Fabrics6866

 

The names change but list goes on

Reflecting the heady pace of change in American retailing, this year's 10th edition of the HTT Retail Report Card includes a number of retailers that have been added to, or deleted from, the ranking.

Among the missing are Bradlees and HomePlace, both of which went out of business. Strouds is no longer a publicly traded company, and its financial results are no longer available. Dollar General, as of press time, had not filed its annual report.

Added to the list this year are Value City, and BJ's Wholesale Club.

To place performance rankings within context, and to measure year-over-year growth, or weakness, the measurements of the Top Three and Bottom Three companies in select performance areas, such as same-store sales and average gross margin, now include prior-year results for the companies.

Methodology

This year's edition of the HTT Retail Report Card is based on data from public documents and was computed by senior research specialist Janice Chamberlain and database coordinator Cynthia Myers.

Formulas used include:

  • Profit margin: also known as net return on sales, it is figured by dividing net income by net sales.
  • Return on equity: net income divided by shareholder equity.
  • Gross margin: net sales minus cost of goods sold divided by net sales.
  • SG&A as a percentage of sales: selling, general and administrative expenses divided by net sales.
  • Net debt coverage: net interest expense divided by operating income. Operating income is defined as net sales minus cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses. This year, five retailers (Bed, Bath & Beyond, Costco, Family Dollar, Lands' End and Lillian Vernon) either did not report interest expense on their annual income statements or had net interest income and so have been eliminated from this measurement.
  • Inventory turns: cost of goods sold divided by the average of beginning and ending inventories.
  • Operating return on sales: operating income divided by net sales.

The Report Card was compiled under the direction of business editor Don Hogsett and director of market research Kay Anderson.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Fall Market Kick-Off Party - part I
    HTT’s Market Kick-Off Party on Sept. 15 at the 230 Fifth Penthouse & roof deck drew hundreds of industry execs looking to beat the heat and mingle with colleagues.
  • Fall 08 Market Kick-Off Party - part II
    HTT’s Market Kick-Off Party on Sept. 15 at the 230 Fifth Penthouse & roof deck drew hundreds of industry execs looking to beat the heat and mingle with colleagues.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Home Textiles Today Extra (Daily)
Home Textiles Today's Green (Occasional)
Furniture Today eDaily (Daily)
Furniture Today Bedding Today eWeekly (Weekly)
Furniture Today's Green (Occasional)
eDaily Classifieds (Weekly)
Home Accents Today eWeekly (Weekly)
Home Accents Today Product Line (Bi-Weekly)
Home Accents Today Green (Occasional)
Casual Living eWeekly (Weekly)
Casual Living Green (Occasional)
Kids Today eKids News (Weekly)
Gifts and Decorative Accessories Direct (Weekly)
Gifts and Decorative Accessories Product Wire (Twice A Month)
Gifts & Dec Double Take (Occasional)
Playthings eXtra (Weekly)
Playthings Product Watch (Twice A Month)

About Us    |    Advertising Info    |   Site Map    |   Contact Us    |    Subscription    |   Affiliate Links    |    RSS
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites